The time has come (actually, it came a long, long time ago) to end our charade against steroids. For all the railing against steroids, gambling, cocaine use, gun possession and illegitimate fatherhood, an athlete can really only commit one sin: losing.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d69d7/d69d7b181f24ba8765ae1a3ccf950fa55e889581" alt=""
Why do we watch sports? One might paraphrase the late director Robert Altman and say, "to see something I've never seen before." Sports always offers that magical possibility - and steroids turn that into a more probable reality. As fans, we want records to fall. We want new levels of greatness to be attained. We want to see people run faster, lift more, jump higher, hit harder. As Brian says, we want to see someone hit a baseball 550 feet, back acne be damned.
Of course, it's still easy to enjoy sports without world records falling. Sports are still plenty of fun when your team wins. And make no mistake about it - we expect the guys on our team to do everything humanly and inhumanly possible to win. They must play with broken ribs, sprained ankles, concussions, and joints that have been dislocated so badly they would keep us out of our jobs for weeks. And if they don't, we call them soft. Bitch about all the money they make. How they don't love the game the way we would if only we had the chance. And did I mention he's soft. Hey maybe he's gay, that would explain why he's so damn pathetic. It's more than a tacit acceptance of steroids in sports - we pretty much demand that athletes inject themselves however often they need to in order to be ready to play come gametime.
I'm not crazy. I don't explicitly WANT steroids in sports. But I want to see athletic greatness - when the Olympics are on, I want records to fall. I want to see star NFL players compete every week, I don't want to see third-string backups. I want harder hitting on faster surfaces, not tamer games less likely to cause harm.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a14bf/a14bf2ccddbd7d080e814b69f7cfdbfc60354057" alt=""
And what do you know? He was using steroids. It was as if some kind of fucking national victory had occurred. The big, bad steroid man was taken down. Gold medal for the USA. Steroids bad, USA good. Don't do drugs. Just say no. Americans have honor. All was right with the world.
I wasn't even 5 years old at the time. It would take me another decade-and-a-half to understand that the excitement had little to do with a cheater being caught and had everything to do with an American winning. Us winning.
Everything is about winning. Lance Armstrong is a winner, so we dismiss all claims he could be using steroids as jealousy from those loser European nations. We don’t even really bother to read the details of the allegations. We are, as a nation, 100% behind a guy literally everyone in the cycling world is convinced uses steroids. In San Francisco, they still root for Barry Bonds, even though he 1) obviously uses steroids and 2) already admitted to having used steroids. Hey, the guy can still get on-base. And the fans loved Sammy Sosa until he couldn't hit anymore. And we loved Mark McGwire until he retired and wasn't awing us with those jaw-dropping moonshots.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4d883/4d883b019397a448bf84c7f286eacfe36b181916" alt=""
I can pinpoint the moment I decided I would never again listen to any of the sanctimonious bullshit about values in sports. It actually didn't have a thing to do with steroids. In the 2001 NBA playoffs, Vince Carter's Toronto Raptors were set to play Philadelphia in Game 7 of the Eastern Conference Semifinals. The game would occur that afternoon - Carter intended to attend his college graduation from the University of North Carolina with buddy Brendan Haywood.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/dd2b6/dd2b6bf30d8d0a5dcd53aa5482f0662ad6567363" alt=""
Reality is unfortunate, but that doesn't make it less of a reality. Kids are sure to get hurt from steroids, but there's not a lot we can do unless we change our fundamental sports culture, and I don't see that one happening anytime soon. At least if we accept it, we can end the parade of hypocrisy that decries the very notion that Mark McGwire should be in the Hall of Fame, but openly celebrates and rewards the accomplishments of Shawne Merriman.
So you know what? I'm okay with steroids. I'm done thinking about it. Things are simpler this way - I don't need to reflect sports through some societal prism all the time and rise on my high horse or sink down in dismay. So put Mark McGwire in the Hall of Fame, go ahead and make Shawne Merriman an All-Pro. Call off the Congressional investigation, stop raiding BALCO. No more tell-all books, no more grand juries. I can just follow the games, root for my teams to win, and hope for the spectacular to happen.
And if that means steroids, so be it.
3 comments:
i don't know... i think you're underestimating the influence of professional athletes on impressionable kids.
when mcgwire admitted he used creatine, that created instant credibility among amateurs and creatine use by teenagers skyrocketed.
can you imagine the effect if steroid use is explicitly allowed? steroid use might be prevalent in pro sports, but i think that usage declines at lower levels. i would rather see less home runs in the big leagues if that meant seeing less negative effects among wanna-bes.
and where would you draw the line? high school age? junior high school? elementary?
would it be limited to steroids?
wouldn't every kid who dreamed of playing in the nba want to get hgh shots for added inches and a better chance of making it onto the jv team?
it's a nice argument, but i think it opens up a slippery slope...
Don't get me wrong, I don't think there aren't negative effects here. I agree with you, explicit allowance of steroids would indeed cause a usage increase, but I'm not sure it's as dramatic as you might think.
My perception is that most kids seriously contemplating a future in baseball, football, track, cycling, or a variety of other steroids-infested sports have, in very real terms, already had to face the decision of whether they want to use steroids. And there will still be plenty of deterrents - the chemicals themselves are sold as illegal drugs (I don't mean they should be legally sold, simply that our attitude towards them in pro sports ought to change), they will still lead to kids having acne and having sexual problems, parents will still fight against it...
In any case, I don't mean to deny your argument entirely, I think you're very right. But if that's how it's going to be, we need to go all the way on this one. Shawne Merriman - he's done, career over. Forget All-Pro. He's out of the league. Wouldn't that one send a message to the kids? It's really not that fine a line - either we are protecting kids or we are not, and I don't like dancing in that gray area. By cheering for and rewarding Merriman, as a society of fans we have made our decision, and we didn't decide in favor of the kids.
Maybe I'm making the situation too black and white, but I struggle with the implications here. If I'm trying to protect children, why wouldn't I want Merriman kicked out of the NFL? What could be a stronger message? Alas, on a practical level, this is impossible. I'm uncomfortable dancing on that line - if we're not going all out on the social values line of thinking, then I need to ignore it completely.
the chargers should trade merriman. get dome draft picks, get rid of a cheater. win win. of course, this will not happen. but it should.
Post a Comment